Popular Sovereign Movements: Republicanism, Monarchy, and Globalization

Popular Sovereign Movements: Republicanism, Monarchy, and Globalization

----Achen, Christopher H. "Measuring representation: Perils of the correlation coefficient." American Journal of Political Science (1977): 805-815.Anderson, Colin R., Chris Maughan, and Michel P. Pimbert. "Transformative agroecology learning in Europe: building consciousness, skills and collective capacity for food sovereignty." Critical Adult Education in Food Movements. Springer, Cham, 2022. 11-27.*Andolina, Robert. "The sovereign and its shadow: constituent assembly and indigenous movement in Ecuador." Journal of Latin American Studies 35.4 (2003): 721-750. ["A crucial development in current Latin American politics is the growing involvement of indigenous movements in democracies grappling with the challenges of regime consolidation."]Axtmann, Roland. "Society, globalization and the comparative method." History of the human sciences 6.2 (1993): 53-74.Bailey, Saki, and Ugo Mattei. "Social movements as constituent power: The Italian struggle for the commons." Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 20.2 (2013): 965-1013.Ballard, Steve. "Rethinking Government in Maine." Maine Policy Review 4.1 (1995): 58-59. ["In virtually all segments of society we are re-thinking and re-designing our institutions and traditional approaches to decision-making. In the 1980s, many American businesses were forced to do this as a result of having to compete in a global economy. In the 1990s, faced with complex social problems and inadequate resources, we are re-engineering concepts of leadership, public organizations, educational institutions, and government."]Bellamy, Richard. "A European republic of sovereign states: sovereignty, republicanism and the European Union." European Journal of Political Theory 16.2 (2017): 188-209.Benhabib, Seyla. "Twilight of sovereignty or the emergence of cosmopolitan norms? Rethinking citizenship in volatile times." Citizenship studies 11.1 (2007): 19-36.Beran, Harry. "A liberal theory of secession." Political Studies 32.1 (1984): 21-31. ["Secession is a forgotten problem of political philosophy. By secession I mean the withdrawal, from an existing state and its central government, of part of this state, the withdrawing part consisting of citizens and the territory they occupy. The seceding part lays no claim to the legal identity of the existing state and usually is the smaller part of it. If the part of the state which challenges its unity includes the central government and lays claim to the legal identity of the existing state, we have a case of expulsion rather than secession."]Bishara, Amahl. "Sovereignty and popular sovereignty for Palestinians and beyond." Cultural Anthropology 32.3 (2017): 349-358.Borriello, Arthur, and Nathalie Brack. "‘I want my sovereignty back!’A comparative analysis of the populist discourses of Podemos, the 5 Star Movement, the FN and UKIP during the economic and migration crises." Understanding Conflicts of Sovereignty in the EU. Routledge, 2021. 17-37.Brand, Ronald A. "External sovereignty and international law." Fordham int'l LJ 18 (1994): 1685.Brilmayer, Lea. "Secession and self-determination: A territorial interpretation." Yale J. Int'l L. 16 (1991): 177.Brown, Wendy. "Guns, Cowboys, Philadelphia Mayors, and Civic Republicanism: On Sanford Levinson's The Embarrassing Second Amendment." The Yale Law Journal 99.3 (1989): 661-667.Canovan, Margaret. "Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy." Political studies 47.1 (1999): 2-16.Cerny, Philip G. "Globalization and the Erosion of Democracy." European Journal of Political Research 36.1 (1999): 1-26.Chopra, Jarat, and Thomas G. Weiss. "Sovereignty is no longer sacrosanct: codifying humanitarian intervention." Ethics & International Affairs 6 (1992): 95-117. ["Chopra and Weiss address perhaps the fundamental issue in international relations today: the sacrosanct sets of sovereignty. The word “sovereignty” explains why the international community has difficulty countering human rights violations. The authors address questions such as “Is there a line between a state's sovereignty and the international community?”, and “Can there be laws to guide states and collections of states in determining when this line can or should be violated?” by studying recent cases where human rights came into conflict with intervention."]Claeys, Priscilla. "The creation of new rights by the food sovereignty movement: The challenge of institutionalizing subversion." Sociology 46.5 (2012): 844-860.Clark, Ann Marie. "Non-governmental organizations and their influence on international society." Journal of international affairs (1995): 507-525.Cohen, L. J. (1986). Federalism and Foreign Policy in Yugoslavia: The Politics of Regional Ethnonationalism. International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 41(3), 626–654. doi:10.1177/002070208604100306 Connor, W. (2004). The timelessness of nations. Nations and Nationalism, 10(1-2), 35–47. doi:10.1111/j.1354-5078.2004.00153.x Connor, Walker. "The politics of ethnonationalism." Journal of International affairs (1973): 1-21.Conversi, Daniele. "Sovereignty in a changing world: From Westphalia to food sovereignty." Globalizations 13.4 (2016): 484-498.Deudney, Daniel H. "The Philadelphian system: sovereignty, arms control, and balance of power in the American States-Union, circa 1787–1861." International organization 49.2 (1995): 191-228. ["A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican version of liberal political theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of security that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not necessary because an intermediary structure, here dubbed “negarchy,” is also available. The American Union from 1787 until 1861 is a historical example. This Philadelphian system was not a real state since, for example, the union did not enjoy a monopoly of legitimate violence. Yet neither was it a state system, since the American states lacked sufficient autonomy."]Elshtain, Jean Bethke. "Sovereign God, sovereign State, sovereign self." Notre Dame L. Rev. 66 (1990): 1355.Finn, Brandon M. "The popular sovereignty continuum: Civil and political society in contemporary South Africa." Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39.1 (2021): 152-167.Fritz, Christian G. "Popular sovereignty, vigilantism, and the constitutional right of revolution." Pacific Historical Review 63.1 (1994): 39-66.Gerbaudo, Paolo, and Francesco Screti. "Reclaiming popular sovereignty: The vision of the state in the discourse of Podemos and the Movimento 5 Stelle." Javnost-The Public 24.4 (2017): 320-335.*Gerbaudo, Paolo. "The ‘movements of the squares’ and the contested resurgence of the ‘sovereign people’in contemporary protest culture." Available at SSRN 2439359 (2014).*Habermas, Jürgen. "The European nation state. Its achievements and its limitations. On the past and future of sovereignty and citizenship." Ratio juris 9.2 (1996): 125-137.Haslam, Paul. "Globalization and effective sovereignty: a theoretical approach to the state in international political economy." Studies in Political Economy 58.1 (1999): 41-68.Helleiner, Eric. "National currencies and national identities." American Behavioral Scientist 41.10 (1998): 1409-1436.Hirst, Paul, and Grahame Thompson. "Globalization and the future of the nation state." Economy and society 24.3 (1995): 408-442. ["This article addresses the issue of whether the nation state has a future as a major locus of governance in an increasingly ‘globalized’ economic and social system."]Inoguchi, Takashi. "Peering into the future by looking back: The Westphalian, Philadelphian, and anti-utopian paradigms." International Studies Review 1.2 (1999): 173-191.Johannsen, Robert W. "Stephen A. Douglas, Popular Sovereignty and the Territories." The Historian 22.4 (1960): 378-395.Joppke, Christian. "Asylum and state sovereignty: A comparison of the United States, Germany, and Britain." Comparative Political Studies 30.3 (1997): 259-298.Kasfir, Nelson. "Popular sovereignty and popular participation: mixed constitutional democracy in the Third World." Third World Quarterly 13.4 (1992): 587-605.Kim, Sae-Jung. "Political Consequences of Economic Globalization under the WTO System." Asian Perspective 23.3 (1999): 237-260. ["This study examines political consequences of the liberal trade order, whose institutionalization has been further pro­moted under the World Trade Organization (WTO). The arti­cle shows that the new liberal trade order will not necessarily bring about the positive political effects foreseen by some observers. On the contrary, it is likely to have a number of significant, negative political consequences at the national and international levels. In particular, serious social cleavages and political conflict may result from the asymmetric distribution of gains and costs among different classes and indus­trial sectors that tend to accompany economic globalization"]Linklater, Andrew. "Citizenship and sovereignty in the post-Westphalian state." European Journal of International Relations 2.1 (1996): 77-103. ["Traditional concepts of citizenship and sovereignty have come under pressure from the combined challenge of globalization and the subnational revolt. Against this background this article sets out an argument for new visions of the state in which subnational and transnational citizenship are strengthened and in which one central purpose of the state is mediating different loyalties at the subnational, national and international levels."]Makinda, Samuel M. "Sovereignty and global security." Security Dialogue 29.3 (1998): 281-292.March, Andrew F. The Caliphate of Man: Popular Sovereignty in Modern Islamic Thought. Belknap Press, 2019.Martin, Randy, Michael E. Brown, and Frank Rosengarten. "Introduction: Socialism, democracy and the new world order." Socialism and Democracy 7.1 (1991): 3-10.McNeish, John-Andrew. "A vote to derail extraction: popular consultation and resource sovereignty in Tolima, Colombia." Third World Quarterly 38.5 (2017): 1128-1145.Neuman, Gerald L. "We are the people: Alien suffrage in German and American perspective." Mich. J. Int'l L. 13 (1991): 259.Orentlicher, Diane F. "Separation anxiety: international responses to ethno-separatist claims." Yale J. Int'l L. 23 (1998): 1.Palan, Ronen. "Trying to have your cake and eating it: how and why the state system has created offshore." International Studies Quarterly 42.4 (1998): 625-643. ["From modest beginnings in the wholesale financial market specializing in government debt, offshore has expanded rapidly, penetrating and then dominating an ever growing portion of international economic life. This article reflects on the relationship between offshore and the concept of state sovereignty. My argument is that far from escaping the state, offshore is intimately connected with the state system."]Reisman, W. Michael. "Sovereignty and human rights in contemporary international law." American Journal of International Law 84.4 (1990): 866-876.Simonovic, Ivan. "State sovereignty and globalization: are some states more equal." Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 28 (1999): 381.Smith, Stuart. "The Impact of Globalization on Sovereignty and the Environment." Can.-USLJ 24 (1998): 263.Strang, David. "From dependency to sovereignty: An event history analysis of decolonization 1870-1987." American Sociological Review (1990): 846-860.Strang, David. "Global patterns of decolonization, 1500–1987." International Studies Quarterly 35.4 (1991): 429-454.Strang, David. "The inner incompatibility of empire and nation: popular sovereignty and decolonization." Sociological Perspectives 35.2 (1992): 367-384.Sørensen, Georg. "Sovereignty: Change and continuity in a fundamental institution." Political Studies 47.3 (1999): 590-604.Thelen, David. "The nation and beyond: transnational perspectives on United States history." The Journal of American History 86.3 (1999): 965-975.Tilly, Charles. "Speaking your mind without elections, surveys, or social movements." The Public Opinion Quarterly 47.4 (1983): 461-478. ["When Paul Lazarsfeld gave his 1950 presidential address to the American Asssciation for Public Opinisn Research, he made his topic "The Obligatisns of the 1950 Pollster to the 1984 Historian". In that characteristically wide-ranging talk, Lazarsfeld closed in on a simple but impertant point: Historians' explanations of social behavior often depend an imputations of attitudes ts crucial acters, yet they usually have weaker evidence concerning attitudes than any other feature of their accsunts."]Trimble, Phillip R. "Globalization, International Institutions, and the Erosion of National Sovereignty and Democracy." (1997): 1944-1969. ["In the debate over whether to join the new World Trade Organization(WTO), Pat Buchananhad a point when he argued that U.S. adherence amounted to a significant loss of sovereignty. The new organization, with its rules and compulsory adjudication, will surely constrain in significant ways the ability of the United States - including that of Congress, administrative agencies, and the executive branch of the federal government, as well as that of the corresponding entities in the states - to make decisions without reference to foreign interests that hither to could more readily have been ignored."]Wallace, William, and Julie Smith. "Democracy or technocracy? European integration and the problem of popular consent." West European Politics 18.3 (1995): 137-157.Wallerstein, Immanuel. "Societal development, or development of the World-System?." International Sociology 1.1 (1986): 3-17. ["The terms, society and development, are two of the most common, most ambiguous, and most deceptive words in the sociological lexicon. 'Society' is closely identified with 'state'. 'Development' is closely identified with 'evolution'. Using an empirical analysis of the problems surrounding any discussion of two 'societies'- Germany and Puerto Rico - it is argued that the 'boundaries' of these 'societies' turn out to be redefined constantly, with changing political fortunes, and consequently offer no solid basis for the analysis of social processes. If there is any 'society' that has 'developed' in modem times, it can only have been that of the world-system."]Wallerstein, Immanuel. "States? Sovereignty?: The dilemmas of capitalists in an age of transition." States and sovereignty in the global economy. Routledge, 1999. 36-49.Williams, Colin, and Anthony D. Smith. "The national construction of social space." Progress in Human Geography 7.4 (1983): 502-518. ["Whatever else it may be, nationalism is always a struggle for control of land; whatever else the nation may be, it is nothing if not a mode. of constructing and interpreting social space."]Williams, Rhys H., and Susan M. Alexander. "Religious rhetoric in American populism: Civil religion as movement ideology." Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (1994): 1-15.----Also see:[International Political Economy][Regime Theory][American Revolution][Apartheid (Colonialism)][State Failure (Decalo)][Security Regimes (Private, International)][Counterinsurgency][Counterintelligence][Slavery (legal regimes of,)][Food not Bombs][Engagement (Civic, Political)][Immigration (Pro-goverment)][Militias][Nation State vs. Market State]*[Citizenship][Ethno-nationalism][Autogolpe][Chavismo]['Zonians' (US Resident Nationals)]["Post-Sovereign Political System" (IPE)][Pro-government Immigrants (MigPol): 'New Americans'][Transition Economies][Secession & Separatism][Public Opinion][Sectional Crisis][Electoral Autocracy][Constructive Expatriation][Economic Redistribution][Forced Displacement (Refugee)][Joint Task Force North (JTF6)][Operation Alliance][Operation Border Exchange][Turbiville, GH][Steel, RW][Wood, Gordon][Strang, David][Clinton-Giustra Democrats: Centro Democratico (IPE)][Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC)][Fuerzas Armadas de Liberación Nacional (FALN)][Irish Republican Army (IRA)][Tamil Tigers][Al Qaeda (?)][Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP)]Education For Death The Making Of The Nazi https://archive.org/details/dli.ernet.18157/The Human Rights Trade: Trafficking, SHRO's, and Proslavery Regimes (Arbeitskräfte) https://archive.org/details/ddhh_trade_logrollingSurrogate Protection & Refoulement https://archive.org/details/refugee_surrogate_prot_refoule/Grupos Autodefensas: Community Self Defense (State Failure) https://archive.org/details/grupos-autodefensas_latam/U.S. Resident Nationals ('Zonians') https://archive.org/details/7-fam-1260-renunciation-of-u.-s.-citizenship-abroad/Christopher Monfort (Sovereign citizen): Cold Dead Hands https://archive.org/details/monfort_christopher/American Occupation of New Mexico https://archive.org/details/new_mexico_occupation_us/Risk Management as Private War (Racketeering) https://archive.org/details/risk_management_war_piracy/The "New Economy": Resource Redistribution Regime (Global Energy Markets) https://archive.org/details/nm_2022_campaign-contributions/Danko Aleksic: Economic Redistribution (Security) https://archive.org/details/aleksic_danko/Resource Redistribution Regimes (Economic Redistribution, Recovery, Research) https://archive.org/details/econ_redistribution_recovery/Runaway Slaves: Disability, Pirates and Fugitives https://archive.org/details/hunt-kennedy2019/Market Valuation of Citizenship by Nation (Value of Human Life) https://archive.org/details/citizenship_valuation_actuarial/Forged During the Cold War https://archive.org/details/coldwar_culture_anthro_misc/Made In America: Industrial Arts & the Defense Industryhttps://archive.org/details/industrial_arts_ndea/Federal Civil Defense Administration (FCDA): Food https://archive.org/details/fed_civ_def_admin_fcda/World Trade Organization: Protest Movement 1999 (Globalization) https://archive.org/details/wto_1999_protest-footageEuropean Defense Community, European Union, United States of Europe, NATO https://archive.org/details/haight-shirley-g-1947-dr/Chatterjee, Partha. I am the people: Reflections on popular sovereignty today. Columbia University Press, 2019.Rudbeck, Jens. "Popular sovereignty and the historical origin of the social movement." Theory and Society 41.6 (2012): 581-601.["This article seeks to explain why the social movement had its historical origin in the 1760s. It argues that the rise of the social movement as a particular form of political action was closely linked to a new interpretation of sovereignty that emerged within eighteenth century British politics. This interpretation, which drew inspiration from Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s social contract thinking, not only resonated with the radicalism of John Wilkes and his followers’ struggle to promote civil liberties to Englishmen of all classes, it also spurred a transformation of the repertoire of popular contention."]Van Parijs, Philippe. "Commentary: Citizenship exploitation, unequal exchange and the breakdown of popular sovereignty." Free Movement. Routledge, 2015. 167-178.Pitcavage, Mark. "The lawless ones: The resurgence of the sovereign citizen movement." (2012).*Morgan, Edmund S. Inventing the people: The rise of popular sovereignty in England and America. WW Norton & Company, 1989.Fritz, Christian G. "Popular sovereignty, vigilantism, and the constitutional right of revolution." Pacific Historical Review 63.1 (1994): 39-66.Roberts, Kenneth M. Deepening democracy?: the modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford University Press, 1998.Caldwell, Peter C. "Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law." Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law. Duke University Press, 1997.Katouzian, Homa. "The Popular Movement of Iran: Oil Nationalisation and Dual Sovereignty, 1951-3." The Political Economy of Modern Iran. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1981. 164-187.["The Iranian Popular Movement was a revolutionary episode; but it failed before it could result in a full-scale social revolution. Such a revolution would have required (a) a satisfactory, even though not ideal, settlement of the oil dispute in the short run; (b) the use of oil revenues together with the people’s sense of social involvement, and the newly won international prestige and sovereignty, to uproot the foundations of Iranian despotism, in order to establish a democratic (= melli) political economy; and, (c) social and economic reconstruction and renovation by the application of relevant, and progressive, programmes. Everything depended on the settlement of the oil dispute, and the failure to resolve it was the basic cause of the final disillusionment, disarray and defeat."]Freeman, Gary P. "The Decline of Sovereignty? Politics and." Challenge to the nation-state: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States (1998): 86.Webler, Thomas, and Ortwin Renn. "A brief primer on participation: philosophy and practice." Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Springer, Dordrecht, 1995. 17-33.["In countries with the Anglo-Saxon tradition, public participation is synonymous with participatory democracy. People there associate the very concept of democracy with the activity of participating in government decision making. Participation in Germany, for example, is largely realized through the institution of political parties. To be involved, even at a local level, one must first join one of the local political parties."]Schachter, Oscar. "The decline of the nation-state and its implications for international law." Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 36 (1998): 7.Purnell, Jennie. "Popular Movements and State Formation in Revolutionary Mexico." Popular Movements and State Formation in Revolutionary Mexico. Duke University Press, 1999.Guardino, Peter F. Peasants, politics, and the formation of Mexico's national state: Guerrero, 1800-1857. Stanford University Press, 1996.Foweraker, Joe, and Ann L. Craig, eds. Popular movements and political change in Mexico. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1990.Henkin, Louis. "A new birth of constitutionalism: genetic influences and genetic defects." Cardozo L. Rev. 14 (1992): 533.Linklater, Andrew. "Cosmopolitan citizenship." Citizenship studies 2.1 (1998): 23-41.Spenser, D., & Caruso, B. A. (1993). The Mexican Spy Company: United States Covert Operations in Mexico, 1845-1848. The Hispanic American Historical Review, 73(1), 189. doi:10.2307/2517685https://archive.org/details/nmmi_nat_guard/["Polk followed in the footsteps of Andrew Jackson and John Tyler with even greater imagination. He made a political commitment to annex Texas and later to acquire California and New Mexico. Polk was willing to buy, but Mexico was not willing to sell. The president's plan for expansion of the United States at the expense of Mexico could be realized only by war. "To conquer a peace" was Polk's expansion policy; to force the Mexicans to hand over their land as part of a peace treaty (p. 43)."]Maus, Ingeborg. "Liberties and Popular Sovereignty: On Jurgen Habermas's Reconstruction of the System of Rights." Cardozo L. Rev. 17 (1995): 825.Joppke, Christian. "Asylum and state sovereignty: A comparison of the United States, Germany, and Britain." Comparative Political Studies 30.3 (1997): 259-298.Rodríguez, Jaime E., and Jaime E. Rodr Guez. The Independence of Spanish America. No. 84. Cambridge University Press, 1998.Sassen, Saskia. Losing control?: sovereignty in the age of globalization. Columbia University Press, 1996.Ngo, Tak-Wing, and Eva PW Hung. "The political economy of border checkpoints in shadow exchanges." Journal of Contemporary Asia 49.2 (2019): 178-192.
physical copy

More Books